![]() |
|||
Volume 5, Issue 5 |
August-September 1999 |
||
Police-Press Street Relations Seminar |
|||
![]() |
|||
On
August 30, 1999 a Police-Press Street Relations Seminar was conducted
at the Police Academy. The Seminar was sponsored by the Police
Department and co-sponsored by the Albuquerque Police Officers’ Association,
Lodge #1 of the Fraternal Order of Police, the Chicano Police Officers’ Association
and the National Press Photographers Association. |
|||
The
seminar was designed for first line supervisors and members of
the media who cover police activities in order that both officers
and media representatives attempt to learn and understand each
other’s unique roles in society. About 20 journalists, reporters,
videographers and photographers who are assigned to a police beat,
or who regularly cover police activity and about 20 officers, mostly
recently promoted sergeants met in a day long session. |
|||
The
precept for the training started with the concept that the Bill
of Rights guarantees both a Free Press and a suspect’s right
to a fair trial. The public has a right to know what police do
and how they act. However, police not only have a duty to allow
the public to know, but to also provide suspects with an untainted
trial. |
|||
Because
the right of a free press and the right to a fair trial often are
in conflict police and press relations sometimes become strained. |
|||
Media
access to crime, accident, emergency and disaster scenes sometimes
are restricted, to varying degrees to protect the public from actual
danger and/or to allow officials a clear area to work. How, why
and when such restrictions occur may cause misunderstandings or
tension. |
|||
Chief
of Police Gerry Galvin and Captain Ray Schultz of Training and
Selection Section welcomed the participants. |
|||
Federal
Magistrate Don Svet (former Albuquerque Police Sergeant who left
the Department to go to law school, then became an Assistant United
States Attorney for years then President George Bush appointed
him United States Attorney for the New Mexico District) spoke on
the Sixth Amendment, right to a fair trial. |
|||
Civil
Rights and Media Attorney Jim Dines spoke on the First Amendment
right of a Free Press. |
|||
Former Independent Counsel Patrick V. Apodaca, spoke about the Albuquerque Police Department's "Onlooker's Policy. |
|||
![]() |
|||
President
Manny Sotelo, National Press Photographers Association, of KUSA
TV News 9, in Denver gave the News view of "What is the News?" |
|||
Lieutenant
Francisco Roque Nogales presented the Law Enforcement view, "Crime
Scene: Containment, Interference, Efficiency and Safety." |
|||
Assistant
Albuquerque City Attorney William Winter lectured on the Inspection
of Public Records Act. |
|||
|
Lunch was provided by the Albuquerque Police Officers’ Association and allowed the participants to get to know each other a little better personally. |
|||
|
|||
| Sgt.
, Officer Beth Bayland, NPPA President Manny Sotelo and KOAT-TV
Crime Reporter Jeff
Zevley, share lunch and conversation. | |||
|
|||
| The Law Enforcement Track Law Enforcement Track: "Command Staff and first-line supervisor's role in public statements," was instructed by Detective John Walsh Public Information Officer, which continued into a practical exercise on "sound bites: How to give a successful public statement to the press." | |||
|
|||
|
Detective
Walsh, Lt. Nogales and Sotelo conducted mock television interviews
with the assistance of four local television reporter/photographer
crews who put the statements on video tape for each officers’ later
review. Performances were then critiqued and pointers given on
how to make the most effective public statement. | |||
The
final hour was dedicated to an open discussion. |
|||
Clearly
the best part of the discussion surrounded an incident that happened
the preceding morning. Jeff Zevley, crime reporter for KOAT-TV
brought with him a piece of videotape taken at the scene of a police
operation. |
|||
A
group of young men had been terrorizing a neighborhood overnight
with a drunken party punctuated by sporadic gunfire. Officers were
called and arrived while it was still dark. The men retreated into
a house leaving several spent shotgun shell husks in the street.
They refused to peacefully come out when ordered to do so by officers.
A barricade situation ensued and a SWAT operation commenced. |
|||
Two
television news photographers from different local stations set
up their cameras in what would become a very dangerous situation. |
|||
As
the incident started to unfold the suspects left the house, where
they had been holed up, it became apparent that the television
news photographers were in the direct line of fire. The incident
commander ordered the photographers moved by a field officer. |
|||
Just
as the arrests were being made the field police officer approached
the Photojournalists. On the audio portion of the videotape one
could hear the officer state that the incident commander had instructed
him to move the media members. |
|||
The
Photojournalists protested that the events that were unfolding
were crucial and newsworthy. It was compelling video. |
|||
The
television news photographers asserted their right to continue
taping the suspects coming into custody. The officer insisted they
move stating that if the Photojournalists did not move themselves
then they were subject to possible arrest. The Photojournalists
protested again and the video shook and went off. The officer had
moved the camera or photographer. |
|||
The
next video shot was from a different angle showing the suspects
in handcuffs being placed into a police car. |
|||
Present
at the seminar were Sergeant Mark Garcia, the original first line
supervisor and SWAT Sergeant Steve Rodriguez who was the Incident
Commander, to explain what they saw happening. |
|||
The
Photojournalists had been in a spot that was originally OK, but
when the suspects came out of the house they went to an area that
placed the Photojournalists at risk. |
|||
The
suspects were in bright sunlight and the SWAT officers were in
a deep shadow. The Photojournalists with their eye in the viewfinder
were apparently unable to observe that the SWAT officers’ high
powered weapons were pointed directly at them because guns’ profile
were minimized by the straight on view. |
|||
The
officer who had been ordered to move the camera people probably
did not even realize that he too was in the direct line of fire.
If he had he probably would have told them in more forceful terms
that they were at great risk of being shot, rather than just that
they had to move under threat of arrest. |
|||
| As the participants viewed the tape after the explanation they saw what the Incident Commander had seen and the idea that the cops were pushing the press around evaporated. An audible sigh of relief fell over the group in the realization that maybe the cops actually were trying to protect the camera operators lives. It was a unique moment. With their minds’ changed about what was happening the seminar participants were glad to have had an opportunity to discuss the incident. |
|||
Public
Information Officer John Walsh announced at a Chief's staff meeting
that the seminar was such a success that it would be done again
in January. |
|||
| Tentatively the seminar will become a part of the initial training for all officers on the list of and for newly promoted sergeants. |
|||